Saturday, 8 January 2022

Interview part II - RIP Anne

I have three blogs where this post would be appropriate but I'm choosing to speak here since it's more related to me reviewing my feelings about a book series that inspired me as a writer, and how I feel about future adaptations.

I don't really know what drew me into the Vampire Chronicles, when I think about it, the books were heavy going and verbose, they weren't intended for teens but I just chose to read above my level. I don't actually read a lot anymore. Back when I didn't feel like I was in an unspoken competition for attention as an author, I appreciated reading more, and my style began to gain some semblance of being "good/better" than how I started out. They tell you to read more to write more, I just don't and I don't feel like writing.

Anne Rice died almost a month ago, and I had no idea. Now I do know, I'm not as emotionally affected than as I may have been had she died when I was younger. I was in my early 20s when I was starting to give up, I thought I'd made it to the end of Lestat's saga and I wasn't happy with how it ended. So, upon his return, I can't say I was thrilled with that either. And I don't think I really want to find out the absolute origin of Amel detailed in the later books, because (spoilers) "aliens". Honestly it's something that owed itself to being shrouded in mystery, the Egyptian backstory was genuinely cool, to me anyway, the deeper that lore got the more I was interested. I loved Body Thief being a huge departure from the previous books, Memnoch is dense as hell, that's as close as I will ever get to reading the Bible. I took so much longer getting through the later books and the Witching Hour, which I'd pick up and neglect a lot but somehow I still read most of them before I graduated high school. I just don't feel like I was the voracious reader I appeared to be.

What I'm not opposed to is a remake of the original film. I tried to come up with which modern day actors I'd cast in the main roles, but having said that, I just can't see any other child actor doing Claudia justice. It's Pitt and Cruise I'm torn over in terms of how good they were. Cruise is pretty great but Pitt has these kind of flaccid moments in his performance that seem to take time to get better. Somehow he has more of a lisp for having fangs. And Slater's the best in this, really. Stephen Rae's great but Banderas is on the same level as Pitt, sometimes amazing and sometimes not. I think they had good chemistry by the final scenes. I just can't come up with their replacements (and no, Bert Newton's son isn't acceptable either, Queen of the Damned suffered the Matrix level of cringe associated with being a partly Australian production forced to utilise Australian actors - in fact the ratio would be higher when you have 3000 of Melbourne's then popular goth crowd, I think that added to the cringe factor, but I haven't seen this in a long while). Plus you've lost Akasha's actress, tragically. She wasn't fantastic. Stuart Townsend's performance is acceptable. Seriously, I would like to rewatch this now to see if it's truly as bad as I felt it was in my head. If I can handle the cringe. However, looking at one clip online I can say the acting/direction's about on par with Twilight already so, fuck, yeah this needs somebody else to treat it with the respect it deserves.

I don't know, nor will I ever, how satisfied Anne was with these versions, but I want a reboot fitting her desires for the project. It's not so impossible to pull off, but the biggest issue is, people are pretty tired of vampires by now and you risk doing something too closely akin to the Vampire Diaries if you leave this in the wrong hands. That'd be my main concern. I'd love a TV show over reboots of the movies, I think that's a smart move knowing this wouldn't get much interest as any kind of theatrical release. Time will tell.

But in terms of me feeling like I've lost a hero, I don't feel it as deeply as I think I should. I think about how I'll feel when I lose favourite musicians, I've departed from nearly all my fan bases the likelihood of me seeing any info would be slim. I'll be the last to know, for sure.

Some reason I became bored enough to give The Claiming of Sleeping Beauty a look into, because it sounded more romantic than completely erotic. I was wrong. It's pretty rapey and wired and too fixated on torturing nubile barely legals, (I can't even say for sure aside from we all know what age Beauty went to sleep but 1000 years later it becomes some weebo nonsense logic) going to the point of smothering genitalia with some substance to attract flies, like do you really want that, is that a thing? Descriptions are odd, confusing and mostly grotesque, I feel like there's a limit to spanking even the biggest enthusiast would draw a line at, but reading her when she's at her worst, I can see where I picked up my linguistic habits, same time this looks like a draft for all the editing and repetition. Most of the reviews are: I'm not a prude, BUT. And it wound up being a theme that all erotica had to be labeled with the hideous "if you like that one mommy porn book that sold for millions, you'll love this" despite this being in another realm entirely. It fascinates me reading women who write porn like this, I finally got Bad Behaviour by Mary Gaitskill just for Secretary but the other stories are fine. Similar, but fine. She's an okay replacement for Homes but I'm still pretty much over her too.

I want to read Tale of the Body Thief on its own at some point.

Tuesday, 4 January 2022

The thinking man's schlock: Nobody

I was onboard for John Wick with Bob Odenkirk, i.e. Nobody, the concept of it at least. I liked what I saw of the John Wick series, but you can tell it's for a younger audience so to speak, despite Keanu getting a little long in the tooth at this point, he still appeals to "my" generation and younger, he's more recognisable. Odenkirk's become popular via Better Call Saul (I'm dying for the last season), and his character here's pretty fun, just I'm not a man and I don't know what it's like to be emasculated by robbers. Look, I get being pissed your daughter's had something stolen off her, that's your last straw, but this is kinda ridiculous in terms of me being able to root for a guy who couldn't let that shit go. I'm sure it's really clear to a family man who loves guns and can't handle simply protecting them with commonsense logic in the form of not fighting back. So this feels a little like parody, it's comedic but the drama's there it's just harder to really champion this guy's solutions to his problems. It's a romp. What do you do with a guy who's still got that blood-lust from the war, who can't change his stripes but wants to just settle down?

You have fun with it, I guess. And I'm having fun but I feel like this is supposed to be more cerebral than John Wick, the idea this is a shared universe movie absolutely annoys me, even if you have a writer in common, you trust that writer knows where to draw lines in the sand. Audiences sit and come up with "wouldn't it be cool if?", some indie movie sites pick it up as a clickbait article, you read it and roll your eyes. Yet Nobody's definitely got more going for it in terms of character and charm. It's more fun to say, "What if a guy like Bob Odenkirk had a bad day and went John Wick on a bunch of motherfuckers?" That's it. But this is still the thinking man's John Wick. You're exploring the consequences of toxic masculinity and grey moral values. This is Falling Down if Michael Douglas had access to more guns and questionable ex-military contacts, but managed to maintain his marriage and keep his kids. Oh, you also get Christopher Lloyd packin' heat. This wins.

Tuesday, 21 December 2021

Revisting the Peaks...

A combination of following Twin Peaks fan insta pages and seeing Richard Horne on the Witcher the last week led me to revisit the Peaks. I was hesitant for a while but it felt right when I was running out of YouTube videos and didn't want to get into something new.

I won't go on about my love of this show too much, I have elsewhere, here mostly. And off and on, in various posts. I even forgot there was talk of the Return getting binned because Lynch wasn't going to be involved and if that were the case, nobody wanted a bar of it. Him deciding otherwise led to my last viewing, and honestly, I don't think I've seen this through more than ten times. I also decided how much others needed to see, so I'm the asshole who won't let you watch season 2 in its entirety because of a few pointless, irritating storylines. But I see now I've been kinda unfair about most of them. Save 2. So I'll just go over why I was wrong for each one.

James and Evelyn: This was the show at peak soap. James leaving town and getting embroiled with a dissatisfied rich housewife who needs someone to frame for her husband's murder, I always skipped over this because I thought it was painfully cheesy. It's not. It gets a bit dull and stupid with the "brother" accomplice of Evelyn's, and I thought Donna coming in to save James was over-dramatic. It wasn't, it's not the worst thing, I watched it through again and I didn't hate it, James isn't awful, Evelyn isn't a total trope, just the "brother". James brings up Laura, since we're at the point where we're playing "hey, remember why we used to watch this show", most of James's actions are formed by Laura's death. But him leaving isn't a waste of time to watch. It's fine.

Audrey, Ben and the South: Ben's mental breakdown after being released from jail and losing Ghostwood to Catherine, it's hilarious and I thought it sucked, but it really doesn't, it's a good dose of comedic relief, you get a funny Wizard of Oz moment, Ben's great as General Lee. Bobby's bugle is funny, even if Bobby's being a dick by then. I had more fun watching it. Audrey plays Jerry (Yeah, Ben and Jerry is a funny thing) and she's making smart moves to protect Ben and the company. Bobby and Audrey have a good moment of chemistry, they definitely seem suited but it's obviously to make you believe Bobby might cheat on Shelley. It's worth sitting through. I had fun.

Nadine and Mike: Glossing over how unhealthy it is in reality they're letting Nadine go to high school and date Mike (as much as it is Jacoby letting Ben believe he's about to win the Civil War), Nadine's actually less obnoxious as a teenager, and her stuff with Mike is fucking hilarious. Again, it's good comic relief. She beats up Hank, who's kind of pointless by now, it just sucks by the end she regains her memory and splits up Norma and Ed. (Never mind about them crazy kids, they make it in the end). It makes me giggle.

Audrey and John Wheeler: Billy Zane. In his element. I love him with Audrey, I hate they don't make it. I hate what happens to Audrey in the end. She's such a strong character I don't know why Sherilyn Fenn got the raw end of the Return deal.

MT Wentz: Fuck that shit. I put up with it this time because it doesn't suck but it's also not good. Norma has nothing better to do so her mother has to come into town and needlessly shame her, bringing her crook husband whom Norma doesn't give a shit about despite him and Hank teaming up (some of the Coop drug bust stuff gets kinda boring but it's not skippable, plus Denise Bryson, I mean really. It's all good). But the conceit of the food reviewer coming to town is a lot of padding, and means we also have to suffer through Piper Laurie in yellow face a la Micky Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany's. I sit through that but it's so fucking bad.

Bobby, Shelley and Leo: Most of that's funnier than I remember too. Bobby turning into a jerk kinda makes sense, Leo being a vegetable is a riot. He gets screwed later with Windom. I chuckle more watching it now. Also as a side note, I used to think Bobby's talk with Major Briggs about that dream was cheesy crap too but I appreciate it more. Bobby's a great character. I'm more bummed than ever about him and Shelley just not making it, and Shelley learning nothing in the long run. Oh, and they're the same age, she was a dropout. I just had it in my head she was older because she doesn't really look 18 and she was married. Her fighting with Bobby and running off with Leo kinda makes sense as it's detailed in the Dossier, but I don't believe it.

So what can't I abide?

1) The Milford brothers bullshit and that redhead. It's insufferable, it's set up at Leland's wake, but it's just absolutely pointless. It really exists as filler and you can skip it all without any consequence as to what's going on, aside from the redhead demanding she win Miss Twin Peaks (I tend to skip the chunks she's in during that section as well), she's really just absolute background noise, and any scene she's in where all the men fawn over her isn't funny enough to give this shit a pass. The Mitchem Brothers were at least somewhat entertaining. So, you can actually safely ignore/skip all that and be fine.

2) The Lucy, Dick and Andy show with Little Nicky. Jesus, this is absolutely the fucking worst thing. The guy from Quantum Leap (Dick) is easily the worst character in the show. You can't remotely give a shit about him and he sticks around way past his welcome to get involved in Miss Twin Peaks too. Prior to all this, Lucy's sister Gwen is basically the shark the show jumps because she comes in right when things go bad for season 2. Soon as she's on screen I reach for the remote, and I keep it close by as soon as Dick comes on screen. Basically once the kid shows up I have no interest in that shit. By all means if you want to endure this bollocks for the sake of Lucy learning who her baby daddy should be and Andy being a "whole damn town", go ahead. But if you're watching with me, you're missing me with that shit.

Stuff like Josie and Andrew isn't that terrible. I like Josie more than I used to. I don't think Joan Chen gets enough credit. She and Harry smoulder on screen, I love them as a couple and I hate she dies. When it turns into the Andrew, Catherine and Pete show with that stupid key again it's tiresome but worth watching. Josie's great up until she has the heart attack then it's a bit overwrought, and we get reminded about Bob because that thread's gotten lost again even if Windom's linked to the Black Lodge. Running theories are Josie winds up there because she's trapped in the drawer handle, which may be linked to the Lodge. I don't know.

I used to think Harold's storyline was kinda crap (having a pretty Blu-ray also means you have to see the red paint on the garden hoe he scratches his face with, so there's something to be said for grainy shitty VHS and what it hides. Digitising all the shows is a nice idea in theory, Dan was right, people filming TV before DVDs never considered people actually ever wanting to watch this shit ever again). So much of what I thought was terrible really isn't. The pilot is fucking amazing, just watching it recently I forgot how much was set up and how effective it was. I don't think I've skipped more than half an hour's worth of show, really. I'm looking forward to rewatching the Return, which I've only seen two times I think. I wanted the Bluray player so I could keep watching Fire Walk With Me.

The thread with Ben and Donna getting completely dropped in the Return kinda annoys me. Ben doesn't even have a dent on his head, Doc Hayward shows up on a conference call with the new Sheriff. I don't appreciate that stuff's just ignored. James somehow has less to do. We never see Donna again but her sister suddenly matters (she affects Shelley's daughter's marriage to the dropkick Stephen, apparently she had a nervous breakdown). I might come back and go over what I can't deal with in the Return, because there is stuff I thought was bad. I have to remind myself a lot the show really is done in the style of a daytime soap despite it being a prime time show.

I'm well into the Return and it's better in some aspects than I remember, I think Donna's absence means there's little point to dealing with the fact Ben Horne's her dad and not Doc Hayward, and maybe Audrey kinda being persona nongrata is another way of saying, none of that mattered. It was probably supposed to matter in the theoretical third season of the original we never saw, but I genuinely hated what they did with Audrey, like there was some truth to the rumor Fenn wasn't a welcome inclusion on the show when Audrey's a memorable character in her own right, (and according to Fenn, Mulholland Drive is supposed to be about Audrey going to LA to pursue an acting career). The Return is really what Lynch wanted us to experience, what his vision for the show was when the network demanded it be more "normal" I guess. (Having said this, the four hour analysis I watched by one guy and his "God of Light" theory is actually pretentious and a bit over the top, I was following his threads to begin with but once it got to this point I couldn't stick around).

But I don't see much point in the flashbacks involving Bob and Cooper when avid fans of the show are well aware, and I never considered this to be a casual watcher's kind of show when the Return happened, it's very much for the fans. You get a chance to see some of the Missing Pieces from FWWM, but it seems like pointless filler. The streaming service I used did have the movie available with the original show, it's not impossible to find, and the Missing Pieces box set was a big release most avid fans would own.

The black and white shots are so detailed and deliberately disturbing, they seem more detailed and interesting for their lack of colour. I like the concept of the Black Lodge being a result of the atom bomb, where all evil truly begins, when you have to recall the world Lynch grew up in. By now, you wouldn't be on board if you didn't "get" Lynch, and he is not for everyone and never claimed to be. But I disliked the final showdown with Bob and Cooper so maybe this time around I'll appreciate it. Naomi Watts's character isn't so hammy, she's pretty great. Ashley Judd's character seems a touch pointless, unless she's here to prove Ben's a born womaniser. Pete and Catherine are gone, James kinda hangs out like a drifter (he's some delivery driver or something) and Shelley's suddenly defending him. I despise Shelley ends up dating another Leo and leaves Bobby, their daughter's husband is a dropkick (and another Leo) but their whole train wreck of a relationship illustrates the ill going on in Twin Peaks. Philip Jeffries is a tea kettle (RIP David Bowie). We get 1 giant and no dwarf (he's now just a neuron tree with a weird head and another doppleganger) We meet Diane but she's not really real. She's definitely not who I pictured her to be but I love she's played by Laura Dern, as a badmouthed, drunk, corrupted character who's a victim of Mr C and also an accomplice of his by way of being a manufactured doppleganger.

I reached the most intolerable scene, which I think is the only one, involving the random kid who shoots a gun in a car and causes the traffic jam. It's drawn out and irritating with the car horn and the woman with the vomiting zombie kid, the woman screaming at Bobby over shit that doesn't matter while the zombie kid pukes. I endured it until the last few moments and it's the final scene before the credits. There are scenes you can fast forward on rewatch since they have that classic Lynch style dragging out before the story can continue, I'm up to the scene with the French girl taking too long to leave the room and yeah, I'm too lazy to reach for the remote but it's tedious. Also, you have to put up with five minutes of some janitor sweeping peanut shells at the Road House before the remaining Renault brother answers the phone. Oh, I remembered Billy's ugly, bleeding face also makes me sick so I'll probably skip it too, that scene's kinda tedious as well. (I didn't skip it but it's annoying with the eyeless chick sounding like a monkey bird and Billy repeating the bad cop's insults. Also, why does anyone care where the fuck Billy is? He's an ugly-ass drunk with a bloody, weeping face). Then there's the matter of Charlie and Audrey's scenes playing out in a kind of nonsensical dialogue involving one way phone conversations to leave us and Audrey hanging. I don't know if Audrey's impatience is representative of the audience's impatience. Sarah watching the glitched out boxing match with the repetitive horn in the background gets grating too. Also the scene with Cole's hearing aid giving obnoxious feedback while a dog barks. Honestly, if you weren't prepared for this as a casual watcher, you'd be so confused/bored by all this.

Character wise, Tammy's probably the least likeable. I think the actress is a singer usually, very pretty but not good at acting at all. I think she has a certain look Lynch wanted. Cole's French woman's a little redundant too. You could say the same of the Mitcham Bros trio of Vegas showgirls but the one who speaks the most is actually not bad, and their scenes are kinda funny. 

Sarah's finally succumbing to the madness, I kinda like she was this conduit to the Black Lodge but they don't take it anywhere really conclusive. She's basically the town kook on a bigger level, now she's ripping off people's faces in bars. Carl's back at the Fat Trout trailer park which seems closer to Twin Peaks than Wind River, and he's not so cantankerous, (RIP Harry Dean Stanton), I always liked his character in FWWM there was some heart to him. Albert's back (RIP Miguel Ferrer), still with the sarcasm but not a total prick. The most tragic scenes are with Margaret the Log Lady (RIP Catherine E. Coulson) who performs her nearly bald, on an oxygen tank, in a scene where she's saying her last goodbye to Dept. Hawk, and it's fucking sad as hell. Richard's a good antagonist, played by Eamon Farren, he makes really stupid decisions while tracking down Mr C. Jennifer Jason Lee and Tim Roth make for fun, goofy hired assassins/Mr C groupies.

The musical credits were pretty good, I like they were a platform for performers but they also felt like a way to pad out the episodes. The exception in terms of music choices really is "Audrey's Dance", which is the name of her song on the soundtrack, so it becomes a weird meta-narrative nod to the original series. And given what we see with Audrey might very well be another dream within a dream, it's a strange inclusion to me, and really where her whole arc falls down.

I like the show acknowledges other people live in Twin Peaks and have problems like gnarly rashes and addiction, and boyfriends named Billy who hurl themselves drunkenly into fences and shit but seem to be utterly irresistible people worthy of obsession. Plus you got the crooked cop working at the station stealing letters for Richard Horne.

All the stuff in Vegas is pretty entertaining overall. I'm not a Dougie hater FYI. The wife makes awful coffee, I get that now. I like Cooper leaves a New Dougie behind to keep her happy, it's bittersweet to see some version of him living a normal life he accepts he himself cannot.  Except the FBI in Vegas that's all weird. And I have trouble tracking all the threads relating to Dougie's gambling and the insurance fraud, Tupla Dougie is really stupid himself, he's somehow managed to get himself in hot water despite his imbecilic nature,  so any threat to him is a threat to Coop.

Okay, so my issue with the showdown is really the Brit with the green glove punching the Bob Ball more or less into hell, twice. It's not as comical as I remember, it's an odd way to introduce an unrelated character to the town, you can never say if Lynch planned this from the start or what, you'd assume so. But Freddy's the hero. Least in terms of defeating Bob. We haven't definitively defeated the evil, that's Laura's job. Cooper's on an odyssey at this point, Laura being the key to all this. Again we get some of the missing pieces with a ret con: What did Laura scream at in the woods that night? It was Coop all along. But in essence, would you call this padding? It has to be a ret con, Laura's scream had to have a trigger, whatever was in Lynch's mind 25 odd years ago might not be what's there in 2017. The scream's not in the shooting script, maybe it was something done on set. But seeing Cooper try to free Laura really got to me. That it doesn't fix everything is a tragedy. Basically the ending makes much more sense if you accept Laura had to die, Sarah's clearly still fucked up, Coop's assumption's wrong, he's somehow ended up in the wrong timeline/dimension. If there's supposed to be more (I can't say if there will be, it's doubtful everything's speculative), maybe we would see what happens to the woman Coop's taken "home". It feels more conclusive to say Cooper was wrong. The fact he's left the Lodge is satisfying but this notion his job's not done because Laura is meant to be saved, it's like saying the audience is naive for loving her enough to want her to live. Bob didn't claim her, he took Coop but they beat him anyway, Coop got free, which is what we've all wanted since that final frame from the original series. On third inspection, I'm pretty happy with the whole Return. Some characters grew and changed, some didn't, such is life. Maybe the most disappointing is we don't really discover Annie's fate beyond Judy taking the ring. According to the wiki (which is basically from the books released later, as far as I can tell) that Milford tart gets the title now Annie's not well. Of course I missed that what she said to Laura in her dream to write about her and Dale in the diary is in the pages found later in the Return, Heather Graham expressed interest but wasn't asked to come back, which I'd take to suggest Lynch didn't have a long term plan for her beyond FWWM, which kinda sucks considering who she was to Coop. The dossier's said to be compiled by Tammy, honestly I would like to sit down and go through it properly, it's actually pretty dense and involved, it's easier to use as a reference guide than an actual narrative work.

About Cooper and Diane, I wound up looking for info on what their sex scene was supposed to represent, aside from it being a throwback/reference to the moment Laura discovers who Bob is. Given Diane's traumatised by Mr C raping her, having to sleep with Coop seems overly traumatic too. Lynch made the suggestion they'd been romantic in the past and only Cole knew about it, and Lynch has claimed Diane is an older version of the character from Blue Velvet. Maybe he's romanticised that one relationship between those characters and wanted to revive it, Dern had a say in how she was portrayed overall, which I like. I always pictured Diane to be a mousier version of Tammy, with less suggestive pencil skirts and business jackets, beige hosiery, sensible shoes. So I like she's not who I imagined, and Dern seemed right for the part. (I've seen one person assume Diane was Coop's tape recorder, which cracked me up and infuriated me).

I think the Return is what we deserved out of season 2 and what we should've gotten. I agree while it's broken down into episodes, it plays more like a movie. I don't think we have a right to complain about what we got anymore. We're done, I think to ask for more right now is kind of selfish on the part of the fans, you can hope all you want but seriously, if the one person you trust to a series says it's run its course, you have to trust the story's been told. He treats each project the same despite the format, so we were extremely lucky to receive the Return presented the way it was considering it may have become a disaster. I'm happy for it to be put to bed as is. 

 

 

Sunday, 19 December 2021

Venting about: Region Codes

Short story: Region codes are bullshit. Long story: I have struggled to really get my point across about how fucking bullshit they are. Because most people (not all) I know didn't tend to watch a lot of foreign and/or indie films, they weren't ever stuck with a bunch of region 1 DVDs, like I am. Also, my impatience led me to ordering several DVDs of movies I loved from the US rather than waiting the however many months or years it would take at that point to finally get a region 4 version in Australia. The other nightmare associated with this is if a not so popular US or international series came out on DVD here, they'd release 1-2 seasons, not factor in people who wanted a box set and were refusing to buy a third of what they wanted because they assumed the box set would come out,  until the distribution companies refused to release the remaining seasons due to poor sales of the first seasons. So I might have News Radio seasons 1-2 on region 4 but the rest are all stuck on region 1. And that's JUST my DVD issue.

Enter the BluRay problem: Okay there's only 3 regions but go fuck yourself if you want an actual multi-region BluRay player that works straight out the box. I was on the look out for a region free player for years and refused to pay around 300 bucks for one. Maybe if I had, I wouldn't have encountered the same problem with the 89.00 one I picked up today in the hope I wouldn't have to fuck around with any codes or locks. I was wrong, and I knew deep down, I'd be wrong. If you ever see one advertised as "region free or multi-region" it's not entirely a lie, but it's not the absolute truth. It can "support" all the BluRay regions if you're willing to fuck around with it. I don't understand how these are still being manufactured with separate functions to force the player to do what it should just do automatically, but after some bullshitting and realising I have to use HDMI or else (which is fine), the fucking thing decided to work. 

I had this argument with a fucker in Harvey Norman many years ago and I refused to accept a DVD player that had to be coded to accept other regions. That player is getting old and I really wanted to replace it one day but I didn't want another DVD player. A BluRay player has more flexibility, at least with most discs, but when it comes to that archaic bullshit region locking issue, you're just not "allowed" to have a machine that works automatically. You've bought a multi-region DVD player that you have to "jimmy" to make it play other BluRay regions, and you have to keep changing it back to make it do what you want depending on the disc. And there's a function you can change countries but that has absolutely nothing to do with the region codes themselves, so even that's password protected for no fucking reason because it seems to make no fucking difference to anything.

I also decided to go back to watching Twin Peaks so either I just use my DVDs like I was doing, or I "jimmy" it back to region B (in this case 2). It's something I have to ultimately live with. I'd like to just watch the BluRays I have without having to muck around with hidden settings they can't just legally fucking give you as part of the actual interface.

You go through this BS and this is all while you're thinking this is what I get for trying to do the right thing and not steal every fucking movie I want. End of the day, physical media has to exist if you want a copy of what you like forever. I would have watched Twin Peaks on Stan but it's gone now, all of it, including the Return, which they had exclusive rights to. And you can think, oh, maybe one day it'll come back. Doesn't mean it won't disappear again.

This is how much shit people go through just to watch a fucking movie. And now I'm finally about to get one particular movie on BluRay, hopefully as it's not locked, I won't have issues dealing with it.

Wednesday, 24 November 2021

Mindbending films that don't bend my mind so much

I'm not going to go into the plot of a movie called Predestination. It's based around a paradox and I struggle with some factors of time travel movies. They should've stopped at Terminator 2 and never made the Sarah Connor "Somebody left the portal door open" Chronicles. I refuse to acknowledge the other films. But Predestination wasn't a badly made Australian film. It just had a stupid (in my head) premise that impresses people who find that stuff so complex and deep. I thought it was cringey and the concept of a character falling in love with the opposite gender representation of themselves who turns out to be them, was made stupider for the fact it was "dark" when they had sex and they didn't recognise themselves. The make up is done badly enough it's not realistic that this female character wouldn't recognise the male version of herself. Plus she's set up as an intersex person, so I guess the whole concept of them creating themselves by falling in love with themselves just made me cringe. The plot's designed to follow the very concept of predestination whereby all the main characters are the same person. So it has to function around this, the plot with the bomber is intrinsically linked to the plot of the character John, despite both threads seeming unrelated. But I wasn't satisfied by discovering this twist. Long story short, all I could think of for a tagline was "Go fuck yourself. Literally." You don't really know the motivation of this person other than they're stuck in a loop. Plus I have a weird issue with hybrid Australian/American productions that have mixed casts with Aussies doing bad American accents. I still argue the Matrix is hindered by the Australian factor, I couldn't convince people how necessary they were to the "deal" to film here. I kinda liked Daybreakers but I haven't bothered to watch it again. They're not badly made films production wise, it was just the element of someone not realising they'd had relations with someone else who looked like them, that was the part that broke my brain. It wasn't like they really made the character look more masculine because they were intersex.

I'm probably being unfair it was just something that stuck in my craw.

Saturday, 13 November 2021

I'm sorry, but your album for divorced wine moms doesn't vibe with me

I'm becoming guilty of just buying albums of singers/bands that I don't really bother to listen to, because I've always bought their physical media for the sake of collecting them despite them going untouched now. I could put them on a PS3 but now I use my phone and a bluetooth speaker. Technically this is a better arrangement for the artist because I'm now buying two different versions of one album, so more money for them, but the issue is I'm not really listening to the CD either. I got bummed out They Might Be Giants have released so much material, not including side/solo projects, for me to ever listen to and absolutely love and appreciate.

Any new musician/band I like now I buy the digital version since it's something I can have immediately, at a decent quality. I probably won't get physical copies of the new Garbage or Halsey albums. I admittedly only like 2 albums and a bunch of B-sides by Garbage, and Halsey's new record just happened to be more my vibe than Tori's or Garbage's. I didn't fully get into Fetch the Bolt Cutters either. All of these are just ending up on playlists on shuffle so I'm not "experiencing" any of them as intended. I thought I was into Gods and Masters but there are songs on there I keep skipping for being too depressing, even for me.

And I keep skipping the tracks from Tori's Ocean to Ocean. I heard the last song Birthday Baby while out walking and my brain just couldn't handle listening to another dirge about a jilted woman. Between that and Adele giving us more of the same theme, (and she still gets praise for it, I'm like fucking why? Are you not sick of her exploring her relationship failures yet?), I cannot say I'm here for the "soundtracks to your divorce" genre. Even with Tori, she's still married but persistently explores the idea of being divorced or failing in her marriage. Like if you didn't know any better, you'd say Night of Hunters was her divorce album, the way we assume Lemonade signified the near-demise of Beyonce's marriage via infidelity. You can play with those concepts whether they happened or not, but why did I love Lemonade more than Ocean to Ocean? Halsey's new record's supposed to be about being pregnant but lyrically you don't get that impression. The Nine Inch Nails aesthetic added to it sucked me in but the lyrics kept me there, the hooks were good, the themes were still clicking with me, we suffer from the same illness but she's gone darker with it, I get the struggle despite being out of that space. And Adele's younger than me, so I can't say this is middle aged sad bastard music for women because she's like just turned 30, and I'm nearly 40. She suffers from horrible social anxiety, did she write about that instead? Because I don't think she did. She wrote a Bond song, but so did Garbage and Billie Eilish. Just glancing over an article from Adele, the songs mentioned were all about new relationships after the deterioration of an old one. You don't have anything else? Really? Well, it's selling like nobody's business regardless, even though I haven't heard her constantly like before, when she was on every damn cafe and supermarket radio. Like if we're getting CDs named after her current age is it going to be like this when she releases "50"?

I don't think I have an album that's in line with where I'm at right now. You can be in a stable relationship and still enjoy a good breakup song, but I'm also not a single mother struggling with a breakup whereby I need a funeral song for a divorce. I like Adele as a person, I think her sense of humor is wonderful, I still love Tori as a person I'm just too far from who I was when the music clicked with me. Choirgirl was so much more darker and spoke about a miscarriage but maybe that pain felt universal, I still love it. I think Halsey can be socially tone deaf but I was really into Badlands for some reason. Fiona's vibe remains very similar but her music becomes more "her" as time goes on, which I love more. I don't demand these people make albums for me. But I reserve my right to an opinion that it's not for me.

I know I should really give the new Tori album like a proper going over, I keep listening to random tracks and really liking the scope of songs sonically but lyrically my brain isn't into it. I like to go over lyrics when I'm learning songs and there's teeth in some of it but emotionally I keep shrugging. Stuff like: 

There are those who don't give a goddamn
That we're near mass extinction
There are those who never give a goddamn
For anything that they are breaking
There arе those who only give a goddamn
For the profit that thеy're making

To me just doesn't carry any power, like we know this is the case so it's not a revolutionary act to say this  now. When you're dealing with songs about grief it's not the right frame of mind to think oh I have to experience the same loss for this to resonate. I have lost someone this year, and I don't think I've mourned the way I should have. I understand the loss Tori's gone through, I can't imagine how hard it would be to lose your mother no matter how long they've been ill, but then she's had a much closer relationship with her mother, that would be harder to endure. The lyrics do have a lot of sadness/anger/grief I guess it's not coming out in her voice and performance. There's a kind of resignation now fire has become water, which makes sense.

Wednesday, 1 September 2021

Peaky Sons and my permanent inability to keep from making intertextual comparisons between shows. (SPOILERS)

I have a litany of issues with Sons of Anarchy, so much so, I don't think I could sit through a rewatch because of the ending. (See also: Dexter - I could reconsider based on the new series, but same time I'm not stoked enough to actually care about the new series that would justify rewatching). I'll never not feel bad for Jimmy Smits' character in Sons, that travesty lives in my brain rent free, I hate how Gemma ruined everything over her psychotic obsession with family, I hate how Jax went out. I hate Tara died right before she almost got out, she was my favourite character.

But what really got me was the amount of times Jax basically sabotages himself for the sake of the club. I get that's the premise, that there's no way out, but when you have a main character you've been trying to root for since the pilot, and they keep making choices that screw them over, how are you supposed to keep on their side?

And that's all I'm getting out of Peaky Blinders.

I knew there were exact analogies with this and Sons. Tommy is Jax, Polly is Gemma, Grace is Tara, Tig is Arthur, John is Juice. They have younger siblings to care for who are embroiled in the club and used for "errands" and who grow up with loyalty to the family, there are the wives and the girls they need to get certain shit done and help with making little grubby heirs to their empires.

But it's all heading south for Tommy and I'm a little over watching shows where the hero gets it all and pisses it all away. If the tension is prolonged over living on a knife's edge and every episode is another bullet dodged, it gets really tired. I was into Cillian Murphy's performance but the gravelly voice is grating on me, he's a good character that's compromised constantly by his gang and his family, and the law/IRA/opposing gangs like to use him as a pawn or constantly demand loyalty, Churchill keeping him alive more or less for "jobs". The little "adjustments" to history are here, whereas Sons was more loosely based on one actor's experiences to give the show realism, Blinders incorporates real life historical figures to kind of play with what if scenarios, which only ever worry me when it becomes a case of a viewer refusing to look up the facts (like they do with the Crown) and they start to take this version of events as reality. I think the writers of these shows have too much confidence in the audience's ability to discern fact from fiction. How many mates have you had who watched a show or movie based on real events and took it all as 100% gospel. Any retelling has to be taken with so many grains of salt. It's why I'm starting to feel very iffy about the "any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental" clause with fiction, when it's very hard for a writer not to imprint versions of other people and themselves onto certain characters. I know these shows have their own disclaimers if they are insisting upon retelling an historical event, but that's not enough to cover your butt. I think it is legally but it doesn't get removed from the public consciousness. Either people take it all as reality, or they go the other way and think the movie Titanic was just a movie and not based on an actual event. The span of time between the event and the retelling expands, I'm not saying every story written about historical events are completely accurate, if some rando wrote the Bible and tried to get it published, it would be rejected for narrative issues and continuity errors at least. Same time, I don't refute history isn't a goldmine for fictional stories based around certain facts/events. I'm not brilliant at using history in narratives, I'm superficial by being lazy about fact checking. You need a whole other person willing to fact check you because publishers don't.

My real point was the protagonists in both these shows tend to lose the lustre via their actions, that they want to hold on to all that is pure and good once it's within their grasp but the lifestyle they lived to get thus far inevitably drags them back in. Being a gambling man with your livelihood ain't cool, brah. I'm not really gonna get mushy feelings for a problematic hero who has a history of self-sabotage and unreasonable loyalty to their club/gang. You start to think, you put all your stock in people who only care about a nebulous concept based on "feelings" and not for your welfare.